Hi Megan
I think its a partial change of circumstances and Section 598 (1) and (2) come into effect.
This requires the Valuer general to determine the attributable part of land sold and the attributable part of the land remaining. So some of it would become due and some of it would remain postponed. The act says whatever Council considers equitable in 598 (2), I’d say make them pay for the part they sold.
They’re my thoughts happy to hear anyone else’s opinion.
Robert
