2022-23 Rate Peg announced

Tagged: 

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #21557
    Andrew Butcher
    Keymaster

      The IPART has published the 2022-23 rate peg including population growth.
      Councils without a population growth are limited by the peg to 0.7% all others have a variable peg due to their respective changes in population growth.
      The full detailed report can be found here: Information-Paper-Rate-peg-information-paper-2022-23-13-December-2021

      Regards,
      Andrew

      #21561
      Robert Hay
      Participant

        The Hills

        Hi Everyone

        I think that IPart have made a mistake regarding calculations from about Liverpool Council and below. It would appear that your Council’s supplementary growth has been added to the Council on the line above. For example in Ryde’s case its 2.9% supplementary growth has been added to Shellharbour.

        I have phoned IPart and I understand other Council’s have been trying to contact them as well. I will post if I find out anything further regarding this matter.

        #21563
        Robert Hay
        Participant

          The Hills

          Hi Everyone

          IPart has now updated the Information paper with the correct Rate Peg %. 26 Councils had been affected.

          Please go to the IPart website and download the information paper again to make sure you have the correct Rate Peg %.

          Regards

          #21564
          Andrew Butcher
          Keymaster

            Further to Roberts post above please find attached reviewed information paper from IPART. This can also be found on their website.

            Information-Paper-Rate-peg-information-paper-2022-23-13-December-2021 UPDATED

            #21568
            Suzi Flynn
            Participant

              Sydney City

              Thank you both. What a tiny standard increase – 0.7%. Unbelievable.

              #21569
              Danielle Dwyer
              Participant

                Bega Valley

                What does this mean for all of us 0.7%ers 🙁

                #21573
                Robert Hay
                Participant

                  The Hills

                  Hi Danielle

                  I doubt even the most conservative of Councils would have anticipated a rate peg of less than 2%.

                  In the 1st instance you maybe asked to re-estimate your rates based on the 0.7% to see how much revenue you have lost if you have already done an estimate based on 2% or whatever it was that your Council anticipated.

                  Your Management accountant should be also swinging into action and see where any budget cuts can be made.

                  I think it will take a little time for Council’s to qualify the effects and work out a go forward plan.

                  #21579
                  Seon Millsteed
                  Participant

                    WOW what a kick in the (you know). Our CFO & GM fell off their chairs yesterday when I told them.

                    We based our estimates on a 2.0% increase but based on the recalculations on 0.7% this will cost $513K. This won’t cover the increase in wages let alone the communities service expectation levels.

                    Thanks Andrew & Robert for all your information.

                    #21583
                    Andrew Butcher
                    Keymaster

                      Update on this matter:

                      The NSWRP has made a submission to the OLG suggesting two possible solutions.
                      1. Councils be allowed to submit a ‘streamlined’ special variation that aligns with their 2021-2031 Long Term Financial Plan within the CSP. This approach is on the basis that each community has set their expectations and councils have determined how this will be funded. For example, councils with 2% in their LTFP an SV bridging the gap of 1.3% should be allowed (bringing the cap up to 2%).
                      2. The Minister intervene and ask IPART to recalculate the LGCI based on the annual movements between September 2020 and September 2021. This approach is on the basis that the peg announcement had been delayed (due to election) to December and indices would be more relevant and more up to date.

                      We are working with LGNSW on their approach and I will provide a further update as this progresses.

                      Hope you are all keeping safe and have great Christmas and Happy New Year.

                      Regards,
                      Andrew

                      #21668
                      Suzi Flynn
                      Participant

                        Sydney City

                        Hi Andrew,

                        Is there any update on this matter? There is some chatter around.

                        Thanks,
                        Suzi

                        #21669
                        Andrew Butcher
                        Keymaster

                          Hi Suzi

                          Not that I am aware of anything at this stage. I am aware of a number of discussions between LGNSW and the Ministers Office in drawing attention to the issue and note the following resolutions came out of their Special Meeting held this week.

                          3 LGNSW Board – 2022-23 rate peg determination
                          That Local Government NSW:
                          1. Implores the NSW Government to urgently intervene and overturn IPART’s aberrant base line
                          rate peg determination of 0.7% for 2022-23 to ensure that no council is financially
                          disadvantaged.
                          2. Notes that this shock determination will have a devastating impact and exacerbate the financial
                          impacts on councils and communities of natural disasters and the ongoing COVID pandemic.
                          The total shortfall in rate revenue is estimated to be $80-$100 million in 2022-23, with a
                          compounded impact of up to $134 million over ten years. This issue goes to the very survival of
                          many councils in NSW and the Government is urged in the strongest manner possible to take
                          immediate action to save the sector from financial ruin.
                          3. Calls on the NSW Government to provide councils across NSW an operating grant equivalent to
                          the revenue difference between a 0.7% rate increase and what a 2.5% rate increase would have
                          been, noting this will still not adequately cover the cost increases being experienced by NSW
                          Councils.

                          I hope this is helpful.

                          Regards,
                          Andrew

                          #21676
                          Suzi Flynn
                          Participant

                            Sydney City

                            Did everyone see OLG Circular 22-03 – Guidelines for the Additional Special Variation (ASV) Process for 2022-23?

                            It was released yesterday. Please refer to the OLG website for full details.

                            Excerpt:
                            What’s new or changing
                            • The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) will accept and process an additional round of 2022-23 Special Variation (ASV) applications from councils.
                            • For applications made under the ASV process, the ASV Guidelines set out in this circular apply in place of the Guidelines for the preparation of an application for a special variation to general income issued by the Office of Local Government in 2020.
                            • For more information on when these ASV Guidelines apply, please see ‘What this will mean for your council’ below.
                            • This one-off ASV round is available for the 2022-23 financial year only.
                            • This one-off ASV round is for councils that can demonstrate the need for a special variation to meet the obligations they set for 2022-23 in their 2021-22 Integrated Planning and Reporting (IP&R) documentation.
                            • Councils seeking a permanent special variation will also need to demonstrate the financial need for the special variation to be included in their rate base on an ongoing basis.
                            • Separately, IPART has also agreed to undertake a broader review of its rate peg methodology, including the Local Government Cost Index, with outcomes from the review expected to shape rate peg determinations in future years.
                            What this will mean for your council
                            • The ASV Guidelines set out in this Circular apply where council is applying for:
                            o a temporary or permanent single year special variation for 2022-23 under section 508(2) of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act), AND
                            o the percentage sought in the application is the lower of:
                             2.5% (including population factor) or
                             the council’s assumed 2022-23 rate peg as exhibited in its 2021-22 Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) (including population factor)

                            • For ASV applications made under the Guidelines set out in this Circular, councils will need to demonstrate that:
                            o Council has demonstrable financial need such that, in the absence of a special variation, council would not have sufficient funds to meet its obligations as identified in its 2021-22 LTFP as and when they fall due in 2022-23; and
                            o Where councils are applying for a permanent special variation, in addition to the above criterion, the council has demonstrable financial need for the special variation to be retained in its rate base on an ongoing basis; and
                            o Council’s 2021-22 IP&R documentation budgeted for an income increase above the percentage specified for the council for 2022-23 under section 506 of the Act; and
                            o Council has resolved to apply for the special variation under section 508(2) of the Act and that the resolution clearly states:
                             whether the resolution is for a temporary or permanent special variation under section 508(2) of the Act; and
                             the additional income that council will receive if the special variation is approved; and
                             why the special variation is required; and
                             that the council has considered the impact on ratepayers and the community in 2022-23 and, if permanent, in future years if the special variation is approved and considers that it is reasonable.
                            • The ASV application process will be a simpler more targeted application process.
                            • IPART will not require councils to demonstrate community consultation outside of the processes outlined above. To demonstrate community consultation, IPART will consider the consultation undertaken through the IP&R process and consider the resolution to apply for a ASV meets the requirements outlined above.
                            • IPART will release streamlined application forms and further information shortly.
                            • Under this ASV round of applications:
                            o IPART will accept applications until 29 April 2022;
                            o IPART will publish applications to enable community consultation for a period of at least three weeks; and
                            o IPART will notify councils of its decision no later than 21 June 2022.

                            #22030
                            Wendy Robinson
                            Participant

                              Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional

                              Anyone doing a report to council regarding this and would like to share?

                            Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
                            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.