[Emma Murphy]

Hi,

Just wondering has anyone else received an email from Revenue NSW seeking to clarify ESF Data Discrepancies. I received the email at 10.54am today and they require a response by COB Friday!

[David Grima]

Hi Emma,
Nothing yet (fingers crossed).
Wondering what sort and how many discrepancies they have identified AND really how they would know there were any in the first place?
Dave

[Sue Burge]

Hi Emma,

I received an email on 15th January about discrepancies (comparing classifications to rating data from OLG 2022-2023), which I have explained and now they want to me to change the data and re-submit the template. I am not really sure what they want me to change…I don’t think the land classifications are wrong. I am going to call this afternoon.

[Emma Murphy]

Yes our discrepancies are also comparing classifications to rating data from OLG 2022-2023;

Main issues are # of Business assessments to the commercial and industrial codes and a 4% variance in the # of pensioners.

[Sue Burge]

Emma,
exactly what our issues where. I have spoken to Jill @ Revenue and sorted it out. It was just Business rated assessments being classified as GOVT and PUBLIC. Good luck

[Peter ODonnell]

Hi Sue

I had the same issue caused by Goldenfields Water properties rated as Business.

They didnt require me to change anything, just accepted my explanation.

Regards
Peter

[VickiNicholson]

I had the same issue back in January. comparing classifications to rating data from OLG 2022-2023. Advised residential and business rated assessments being classified as GOVT and PUBLIC. We did find a small number that were incorrectly classified (approx 20) Received another email today asking if we are going to update and resubmitt.

[Author]

Posts