Hi all, administrative nightmares aside, does anyone else see a potential conflict between proposed cl 22 (preventing interest accruing after referral of a debt) and s566 LGA (prescribing that interest accrues on rates and charges that remain unpaid after they become due and payable)?
Cheers,
James
Bellingen received the following advice from Revenue NSW in relation to referring accounts:
“The process would be that Revenue NSW will take over the entire portfolio so we would issue the initial instalment/s and continue with debt recovery action if the account remains unpaid.”
Sounds more like outsourcing a big function of the Revenue/Rate team than just referring outstanding accounts for debt recovery.
I believe they are referring to Clause 23(1) of the Bill:
The Chief Commissioner may, if authorised to do so by a debt recovery agreement,
exercise on behalf of a responsible authority any of the functions of the responsible
authority under this Act.
Which is an alternative option a Council may consider.