Outsourcing Debt Recovery Services

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #19046
    Rob Wenzel
    Blocked

      Parramatta City

      Hi everyone,

      At Parra we currently employ at Debt Recovery Officer and engage a mercantile agent to do our legal work. Wanting to hear from those that don’t employ a dedicated Debt Recovery Officer and have a mercantile agent look after all recovery work i.e. Once an account is referred to them, the ratepayer only deals with them. Wanting to hear the Pros & Cons. Thanking you.

      #19048
      John Towers
      Participant

        Life Member

        Hi Rob,

        I’m not sure that it can be that simplistic.

        I think no matter what, you need someone in your office to look after the Councils interest in the matter/s. It might be possible to reduce from 2 internals to 1 but someone needs to do the Council preparation work. In the scenario you describe it means giving access to the MA to ALL your systems & I would have privacy issues there. How would you limit the access to only those accounts/names that are forwarded?

        Whether we like it or not I think some MA’s are looking to use Councils as the Golden Goose. Maybe I’m just cynical.

        JT

        #19047
        Rob Wenzel
        Blocked

          Parramatta City

          Thanks JT.

          We would still retain the staff member and they would look after payments, client status reports and the like (as well as other non-recovery work), but I was wanting the agent to take and manage arrangements/direct debits on accounts that have been referred to them. Wanting them to issue text messages and possibly phone calls before a demand letter (I would expect to pay for this service). Wouldn’t entertain giving them access to our systems though.

        Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.