Robert Hay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 181 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mixed development – old and new Act #19512
    Robert Hay
    Participant

      The Hills

      Hi Cherie

      http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/num_act/lgaa1977n132352.pdf

      Have a look a Schedule 2 page 15. It refers to the old act and Section118

      in reply to: DVA Health Card #20167
      Robert Hay
      Participant

        The Hills

        Hi Linda
        Have a look at question 1(b) on the Pensioner Concession application form. It identifies the TPI card under that section. Page 4 of the application also identifies who is eligible.
        Yes I would grant the rebate.

        Robert

        in reply to: Pensioner concession card #20181
        Robert Hay
        Participant

          The Hills

          test

          in reply to: Determine rating category #19672
          Robert Hay
          Participant

            The Hills

            Hi Amit
            I dont think there is any section in 556 that would allow a RTO to be made non rateable. They definitely dont sound like a public benevolent institution or charity section 556(h). And I’m sure 556(l) land that is vested in a university, or a university college, and is used or occupied by the university or college solely for its purposes would no longer apply either.

            in reply to: Determine rating category #19674
            Robert Hay
            Participant

              The Hills

              Hi Amit

              I’m no good with acronyms, what are RTO and DET? What section of 556 to you intend to use?

              Robert

              in reply to: malicious payments made via payment gateways #19988
              Robert Hay
              Participant

                The Hills

                Hi Karen

                Ku-ring-gai imposes a minimum of $20.00 for their online payments. In line with that we do not issue notices for under $20.00.

                We absorb the costs of all our payments methods but pass on a credit card surcharge.

                We do not have a policy for mailicous use of our payment gateways.

                Robert

                in reply to: Retrospective Rates and Charges (particularly charges) #19992
                Robert Hay
                Participant

                  The Hills

                  Hi Karen

                  Can you please clarify what you mean by back charging? And what this relates to.

                  Ku-ring-gai does amend DWM charges through the year.

                  Robert

                  in reply to: Farmland categorisation #19361
                  Robert Hay
                  Participant

                    The Hills

                    Hi Lee

                    There are some good judgements that can be referenced under the case law link, Under Categorisation – Farmland.

                    Robert

                    in reply to: S563 – Discount for propmpt payment in full #20019
                    Robert Hay
                    Participant

                      The Hills

                      Hi Melissa

                      We dont provide a cash discount because currently about 13% of people pay the full amount up front which means that to offer a very modest discount of say 1% would require the number of people paying up front to increase to about 22% for Council to break even. In simple terms, we believe the amount of the incentive we could offer would not be sufficient to change people’s payment behaviour sufficiently to not cost Council money.

                      Robert

                      in reply to: Retrospective rating #20029
                      in reply to: Rent For Rates #19066
                      Robert Hay
                      Participant

                        The Hills

                        Hi Sue
                        710 Service of notices on persons
                        (5) The notice may be addressed by the description of “rateable person” or “owner” or “occupier” of the land, building or premises (naming or otherwise sufficiently indicating the same) in respect of which the notice is served, and without further name or description.
                        Robert

                        in reply to: Rate Records #20042
                        Robert Hay
                        Participant

                          The Hills

                          Hi Sue
                          The relevant Classification is GA39-25.05.02 which states 7 years.

                          But you also need to pay attention to 712 (6) Service of a rates and charges notice or notice of a charge may not be called into question more than 10 years after the date of alleged service of the notice.

                          I keep them for 10 years.

                          Robert

                          in reply to: Federal Budget Impact #20191
                          in reply to: Charging for dishonoured payments #20059
                          Robert Hay
                          Participant

                            The Hills

                            Hi Susan

                            Kuringai charges a fee which covers what the banks charge plus the cost of admin (listed in Council’s fees and charges). This is charged to the rate account. I dont consider it a deterrent it’s just cost recovery. Council shouldn’t have to bear the cost of the ratepayers payment bouncing.

                            Robert

                            in reply to: Delays by Australia post #20069
                            Robert Hay
                            Participant

                              The Hills

                              Hi Emma

                              Its their responsibilty to ensure rates are paid.
                              However under Section 567 it states:
                              The council may write off accrued interest on rates or charges payable by a person if, in its opinion:
                              (a) the person was unable to pay the rates or charges when they became due and payable for reasons beyond the person’s control, or
                              (b) the person is unable to pay the accrued interest for reasons beyond the person’s control, or
                              (c) payment of the accrued interest would cause the person hardship.

                              I think Section 567(a) may apply in this case.

                              Robert

                            Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 181 total)