[Ashley Cao]

Thank you Suzi!

[Ashley Cao]

Hi Rachelle,

My assumption to this would be if it’s a residential land with a single dwelling on it later on it got demolished and build another single dwelling for residential purpose, the Emergency levy would charge the same and we don’t need to identify it’s a DEVRES. However if the parcel is under construction of becoming apartments the est. Emergency levy would be more for the resident(mainly developer) to pay. In this instance yes it will be DEVRES. Hope tomorrow’s meeting will cover this topic.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by Ashley Cao.

[Ashley Cao]

HI Cherie,

Thanks for your response. We haven’t started legal actions yet, just touch base with customers who’s behind their debts for more than 2 years.
Do you allow 1 default or 3 dafaults occur before taking the next actions?

Thank you
Ashley

[Ashley Cao]

Hi Andrew,

Thank you very much for your response!

Ashley

[Ashley Cao]

Hi Cherie,

It’s a payment arrangement that customer would like to enter, they’ll organise payment on their end.

Thank you
Ashley

[Ashley Cao]

Hi Andrew,

At the Hills area we have lots of residential lots that have been subdivided they are either (1) haven’t lodged DA to build residential dwelling or (2) DA has been lodged but hasn’t started construction yet or under construction. Question, can I include both scenarios as DEVRES?

[Ashley Cao]

Hi Sue,

I got access yesterday, same query as yours the GM letter may not available yet.

Thanks
Ashley

[Ashley Cao]

Hi Sue,

We’re preparing the data now, just wondering if you could share the GM letter so at least we know what supporting documents that we need to submit to Revenue NSW?

Thanks
Ashley

[Ashley Cao]

We also noticed SOC tab has been missing for this year’s workpaper, any update?

Thank you
Regards,
Ashley

[Author]

Posts