David Grima
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hi Andrea,
Good to see someone else spending their Sunday working on this 🙂
My data template includes columns for MDAF (column O) and specified use (column R).
For MDAF, results are either the business percentage or blank.
For specified use, results are BTR, CHP, RVAC, STUD, SERAP, BOAHO, DEVRES or NA (meaning that NA should be entered rather than leaving result as “blank”).
Drop me an email if you want what my template looks like (although it will have WSC data in it).
Davevery lucky Peter 🙂
Hi & thank you Andrew & Peter,
The other part of my question was that I am guessing you are going to use your DA register to identify these?
DaveHi Carmel,
I am just reviewing exempt properties here and reckon there is about 20 to 30 that are exempt that shouldn’t be.
My thought is That groups are being provided a “sympathy” exemption or the notion is that Council is paying the rates for the property so we will exempt the property in the first place (which is the wrong treatment).
Other groups that won’t be happy when I remove the exemption will be groups like the Girl Guides, Boy Scouts etc.
Then there is the CWA but not sure whether I will take that group on as yet.
DaveThanks Andrew,
As usual you have talked sense and alleviated most of my concerns.
DaveHi Andrew,
First up, thanks for all you do mate.
I just want to be clear that I am not shooting the messenger with these words so please don’t take them personally.
Q: If they (Revenue NSW & Treasury) knew this was all happening, why wouldn’t they have had everything (i.e. the manual, the VG data, access to the portal, the templates, even the bloody letter) ready?????
Hence my serious doubts about getting info to them by the deadline, as you say, we can’t make a start until we get these things.
We are in the process of telling them that we won’t meet the deadline and our GM fully supports my view.
We barely have enough time to complete existing workloads left alone this being forced upon us (to complete in less than 6 weeks).
And yes, I know that there are provisions to fine (Council I assume) but they can fine all they want but we won’t be paying it.
You might recall my angst (and me being very vocal) the last time they tried pushing this through and look at what happened in the end.
Might see some more entertaining emails flying by way of Revenue NSW.
Dave
PS despite the best efforts of the working group(s), based on what I know of Tech One I don’t even see how we can get the data into the format that they want – did they even consult anyone before deciding upon it?Hi all,
Does anyone else have serious doubts about getting data to Revenue NSW by 2 December 2024?
By the time we get the file, paperwork, manual, extract data from T1 we will have 4-5 weeks to get it done AND it’s not like we have nothing else to do.
My understanding that if we don’t commit to the 2 December 2024 then we don’t get the funding but then what happens when (not if) we miss the deadline.
Dave-
This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by
David Grima.
yes very helpful, thanks Andrew.
thank you Glynes and Andrea 🙂
Hi Cherie,
We are reviewing our process ATM too but currently accept both options detailed above.
Dave
PS will respond to your Farmland question at some point too 😉BUT how will it work with the change to the valuation cycle? Makes no sense ……….
Hi Rob,
Sorry on 2 counts:
1 that I didn’t click the subscribe button so didn’t get notified that you logged a questionsm and
2 the court case was many moons ago so I don’t have the details.
We actually won the case I recall but the judge made mention of the change in rating category and our solicior (think it was Abbott Tout) advised against changing the category without consent.
So when I receive a change of category application now, I ask Development whether a change of use (or other application) is required, if no, I change the category and if yes, I reject the application and refer them to Development.
Haven’t had any issues since and I think it is a reasonable approach to take.
DaveHi all,
I wouldn’t allow the category change to residential as DA consent is required.
Early on in my career I had a similar situation but where the owner commenced operating a business (can’t remember what type) and I changed the category to business but the owner’s hadn’t obtained consent.
When our regulatory services finally took action, it ended up in Court and we got in a little strife as my change of category to business was seen as a quasi approval of the use by Council.
DaveHi Lee,
WSC doesn’t use flow restrictors although I believe we did years back.
Debt recovery for sure – we go legal on arrears amounts >$600.
DaveHi Carmel,
As discussed, we went live with Payble in November last year – think we were the 1st and could still be the only NSW Council so far offering Payble?
For go live we just tried to mirror what we offered with our inhouse legacy system (rates – total amount, instalment + monthly & water – total amount & monthly) but also added weekly & fortnightly plus the obvious incentive of being able to offer credit card.
The only thing I would have done differently is migrating the existing agreements across rather than making them register again – looking back I think it would have been the case of short term pain (enquiries + complaints) for long term gain (not having to run 2 parallel systems in Payble).
We had the usual teething problems associated with any new software but very happy as benefits far outweigh any problems.
Happy to discuss offline with you or any others looking at implementing Payble.
Dave -
This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts