Suzi Flynn
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hi Susan
Yes that’s my understanding.
Suzi
Thanks Rob.
Thanks for that Tracey, It was particularly positive, was it?
Thanks everyone for your input. I appreciate it. Looks like the City will be sending our own letter with both the April and July mail-outs. Enjoy Easter – it’s probably the last little breather we get for a few months!
Am I the only one disgusted that the media know more than we do?
Hi Susan,
It depends on the details.
Scenario 1 – lots have been amalgamated and a new lot and plan created resulting in the new value: if this is the case then it would depend on whether your Council is rating from date of registration of the plan, the qtr following the registration of the plan or the next financial year.
Scenario 2 – the valuations have been amalgamated as a result of an objection under s35B: check the SIX portal and confirm both base dates were objected to and if so the change would be effective from 1 July 2014. If the objection was only on the 2016 base date then the change is effective 1 July 2017.
Scenario 3 – the valuations have been amalgamated because LPI decided it was more appropriate (ie. no objection) and they have adjusted under s14A(6), then the change is retrospective and effective 1 July 2014.
Scenario 4 – the valuations have been amalgamated because LPI decided it was more appropriate (ie. no objection) and they have adjusted under s14A(2), then the change is not retrospective and is only effective 1 July 2017.
NB. Scenario 3 assumes no land subdivisions occurred on the parcels since 1 July 2014.Feel free to call if there are details I have not accounted for or this is not clear. Also to note, losses under s35B can be claimed back in future years using the workpapers for SS8 but losses under s14A(6) cannot.
Suzi
I haven’t been approached Ken. Interesting!
Hi Cindy,
The purpose of a certificate under s603 is to provide amounts currently due and payable for the protection of purchasers. There is no such thing as providing a certificate at a previous point in time and I would definitely not attempt to do it.
Suzi
Hi Carla,
We have but I believe we are in the minority. Our land owners have received their Valuation Notice with the VG Newsletter that mentions the ESPL but to date we haven’t had any customers contact us about it.
Suzi
Sorry Linda, we don’t here.
We have a project manager hired specifically for ESPL. The rest of the project team are internals so of course it’s pretty difficult to monitor all of our time spent on this but we will try.
I spoke with Tracy Walsh yesterday who mentioned the letter to be sent to Councils but couldn’t advise of when the vals will be issued. It wasn’t mentioned about us indicating a preference but of course they have them already for everyone so I can’t see why they would delay. Those Councils already expecting a GVal are being issued now as normal.
I just saw a request by email yesterday about the Val Notices for Council owned properties being sent electronically. It sounds definitely worth doing.
Suzi
Hi Mary,
While every application warrants its own assessments on merit, we have recently had an application for rating exemption under 556(1)(h) from Mission Australia. The application was successful.
Regards,
SuziHi Adele,
Council land is only exempt if it is not leased, due to the definitions of public land. The purpose of the lease (whether public or private) does not come into it. I think in this circumstance the land is rateable and Council is the liable body, not the Board of Fire Commissioners.
Suzi
Hi everyone,
For those of you that may be rating Fire & Rescue NSW properties, their Principal Solicitor has asked me how they might best communicate this issue to all NSW Councils. I suggested they contact OLG but also will need to speak directly with each Council about the properties for which they seek a rate exemption.
Regards,
Suzi -
AuthorPosts