Suzi Flynn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 87 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: NSW Land & Housing Corporation #19252
    Suzi Flynn
    Participant

      Sydney City

      Hi Susan

      Yes that’s my understanding.

      Suzi

      in reply to: FESL Rates have been published #19267
      Suzi Flynn
      Participant

        Sydney City

        Thanks Rob.

        in reply to: Channel 7 News – FESL Item #19270
        Suzi Flynn
        Participant

          Sydney City

          Thanks for that Tracey, It was particularly positive, was it?

          in reply to: FESL communication from Council #19290
          Suzi Flynn
          Participant

            Sydney City

            Thanks everyone for your input. I appreciate it. Looks like the City will be sending our own letter with both the April and July mail-outs. Enjoy Easter – it’s probably the last little breather we get for a few months!

            in reply to: Press Release – SMH #19306
            Suzi Flynn
            Participant

              Sydney City

              Am I the only one disgusted that the media know more than we do?

              in reply to: Amalgamations & Backdated Values #20420
              Suzi Flynn
              Participant

                Sydney City

                Hi Susan,

                It depends on the details.
                Scenario 1 – lots have been amalgamated and a new lot and plan created resulting in the new value: if this is the case then it would depend on whether your Council is rating from date of registration of the plan, the qtr following the registration of the plan or the next financial year.
                Scenario 2 – the valuations have been amalgamated as a result of an objection under s35B: check the SIX portal and confirm both base dates were objected to and if so the change would be effective from 1 July 2014. If the objection was only on the 2016 base date then the change is effective 1 July 2017.
                Scenario 3 – the valuations have been amalgamated because LPI decided it was more appropriate (ie. no objection) and they have adjusted under s14A(6), then the change is retrospective and effective 1 July 2014.
                Scenario 4 – the valuations have been amalgamated because LPI decided it was more appropriate (ie. no objection) and they have adjusted under s14A(2), then the change is not retrospective and is only effective 1 July 2017.
                NB. Scenario 3 assumes no land subdivisions occurred on the parcels since 1 July 2014.

                Feel free to call if there are details I have not accounted for or this is not clear. Also to note, losses under s35B can be claimed back in future years using the workpapers for SS8 but losses under s14A(6) cannot.

                Suzi

                in reply to: Service NSW OTC Payments #19851
                Suzi Flynn
                Participant

                  Sydney City

                  I haven’t been approached Ken. Interesting!

                  in reply to: 603 Certificate for PREVIOUS financial year/s #18799
                  Suzi Flynn
                  Participant

                    Sydney City

                    Hi Cindy,

                    The purpose of a certificate under s603 is to provide amounts currently due and payable for the protection of purchasers. There is no such thing as providing a certificate at a previous point in time and I would definitely not attempt to do it.

                    Suzi

                    in reply to: GVAL due to introduction of ESPL #19422
                    Suzi Flynn
                    Participant

                      Sydney City

                      Hi Carla,

                      We have but I believe we are in the minority. Our land owners have received their Valuation Notice with the VG Newsletter that mentions the ESPL but to date we haven’t had any customers contact us about it.

                      Suzi

                      in reply to: Collection of Data #19860
                      Suzi Flynn
                      Participant

                        Sydney City

                        Sorry Linda, we don’t here.

                        in reply to: ESPL Set-Up Costs #19519
                        Suzi Flynn
                        Participant

                          Sydney City

                          We have a project manager hired specifically for ESPL. The rest of the project team are internals so of course it’s pretty difficult to monitor all of our time spent on this but we will try.

                          in reply to: ESPL implementation & reval #19448
                          Suzi Flynn
                          Participant

                            Sydney City

                            I spoke with Tracy Walsh yesterday who mentioned the letter to be sent to Councils but couldn’t advise of when the vals will be issued. It wasn’t mentioned about us indicating a preference but of course they have them already for everyone so I can’t see why they would delay. Those Councils already expecting a GVal are being issued now as normal.

                            I just saw a request by email yesterday about the Val Notices for Council owned properties being sent electronically. It sounds definitely worth doing.

                            Suzi

                            in reply to: Mission Australia #19602
                            Suzi Flynn
                            Participant

                              Sydney City

                              Hi Mary,

                              While every application warrants its own assessments on merit, we have recently had an application for rating exemption under 556(1)(h) from Mission Australia. The application was successful.

                              Regards,
                              Suzi

                              in reply to: Non-Ratability for Fire & Rescue NSW #19612
                              Suzi Flynn
                              Participant

                                Sydney City

                                Hi Adele,

                                Council land is only exempt if it is not leased, due to the definitions of public land. The purpose of the lease (whether public or private) does not come into it. I think in this circumstance the land is rateable and Council is the liable body, not the Board of Fire Commissioners.

                                Suzi

                                in reply to: Non-Ratability for Fire & Rescue NSW #19616
                                Suzi Flynn
                                Participant

                                  Sydney City

                                  Hi everyone,
                                  For those of you that may be rating Fire & Rescue NSW properties, their Principal Solicitor has asked me how they might best communicate this issue to all NSW Councils. I suggested they contact OLG but also will need to speak directly with each Council about the properties for which they seek a rate exemption.
                                  Regards,
                                  Suzi

                                Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 87 total)